Bravo Fleet v. FFion (JAG-005)


The Defendant, FFion, is charged with the following violations as defined by Section 6 of the Magistrate Code.

  • 1x Harassment (Plea: None)

    No member shall engage in persistent harassment or torment, or outrageous attacks on any other member. This includes statements and actions taken to attack a member’s real-life political affiliation, family or significant other, gender, race, color, age, disability, creed, heritage, nationality or sexual orientation. This article extends to cover harassment through the distribution of personal information, the creation of groups or modes of communication for the purpose of attacking the member, and unwanted contact with the member through non-internet means of communication. Harassment punished under this article must be to the extent and of the form that would injure a reasonable person of normal sensibilities; mere mocking does not suffice.

  • 1x Cloning (Plea: None)

    Members must not, without prior approval of the Magistrate, have more than one Bravo Fleet account within a single household or on a single connection. Any offense committed by such an unauthorized clone will be attributed to the original member. Matching IP addresses create a presumption of cloning that can only be rebutted by evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that two people exist.


Defendant consistently harassed game managers after rejection of their applications to their games. During the previous Bravo Fleet Administration, Defendant was asked to please recuse themselves from the fleet, and after a year the administration would re-assess and determine if they would allow Defendant to return to the Fleet.

Defendant began repeating the same behaviors a year later, and when asked about it by the current administration, advised of the above. As the behavior had not changed, a permanent ban was placed on the Defendant from participating in Bravo Fleet. To circumvent this, Defendant began creating new accounts to join the Bravo Fleet Discord and with which to apply to games in the Fleet.


  • Exhibit A

    As the Defendant is believed to be below the age of majority, no substantive evidence that would indicate their identity will be provided.

Defendant's Sentence

A summary of the Defendant's sentence, as defined by Section 7 and Section 8 of the Magistrate Code.

This ban was enacted prior to Bravo Fleet having an active judicial system. Given the nature of the offenses, and the overall disruption caused to the Fleet by this Defendant, the ban will stand.

Magistrate Opinion

The Magistrate has unfortunately also had numerous run-ins with this Defendant applying to his games, and summarily harassing players and staff when the applications were denied. Many current and former Game Managers are able to claim the same from this Defendant.


Case Overview

January 1, 2018
Trial Type
Trial by Magistrate

Presiding Magistrate

Niana Tondro

Bravo Fleet Magistrate




Official Verdict

The Bravo Fleet Magistrate (Niana Tondro) has reached the following verdict with regards to the Defendant (FFion).

  • The Defendant is found GUILTY on 1 count of Harassment.
  • The Defendant is found GUILTY on 1 count of Cloning.

Managed By the

Magistrate Office

This trial was conducted by the Magistrate Office. If you have questions about this trial, please contact an office staff member.